/All/
|
index
catalog
recent
update
post
|
/math/
/tech/
/misc/
/free/
/meta/
/test/
|
Guide
light
mod
Log
P76212
Acute Dissection
Thu 2024-02-08 17:24:55
link
reply
6b1675ca4b3cfc183a32a4a2bf20ae04cc0691b74628c4ad965c62b0a342b45c.png
42.0 KiB 720x445
Given a triangle with one obtuse angle, is it possible to cut the triangle into smaller triangles, all of them acute? (An acute triangle is a triangle with three acute angles. A right angle is of course neither acute nor obtuse.) If this cannot be done, give a proof of impossibility. If it can be done, what is the smallest number of acute triangles into which any obtuse triangle can be dissected?
The illustration shows a typical attempt that leads nowhere. The triangle has been divided into three acute triangles, but the fourth is obtuse, so nothing has been gained by the preceding cuts.
Referenced by:
P76413
P82015
P76214
fix tex
Thu 2024-02-08 17:29:59
link
reply
fix tex
Referenced by:
P81994
P81998
P76283
Thu 2024-02-08 19:16:48
link
reply
It isn't possible. In fact, no triangle can be cut into smaller triangles, all of them acute.
1. At some point or another, you will have to bisect the obtuse angle in your initial triangle. Otherwise it will stay obtuse.
2. By cutting a triangle into two smaller triangle by drawing a line from one corner to the opposite vertex, at least one of the resulting triangles will be right or obtuse. (because 180°≥2×90°)
2.1. There is another way of cutting a triangle into smaller triangles, which is to draw three lines between each corner and a central point. In this case too, at least one of the resulting triangles will be obtuse, because 360°>3×90°.
Referenced by:
P76426
P76426
Fri 2024-02-09 06:45:14
link
reply
counterexample.png
27.9 KiB 1824x927 (Spoiler)
P76283
It is possible.
Referenced by:
P76612
Mod Controls:
x
Reason: