Hypothetically, what would happen if you changed the laws of a country to advance the very least fit members to positions of decision making and wealth?

Because the laws of a country can be anything, you can make laws that say that people have to wear shoes on their hands, you could make laws to advance the least fit members of a civilization.

So what would happen if you did that?

What if you made laws to cap the IQ of people in law enforcement and intelligence work?

What if you made economic laws to transfer the wealth to the least productive and psychopathic individuals by legalizing rackets for non-productive people that are so ethically wrong that only a psychopath would "invest" in them?

What would happen when you put idiots in charge of government and psychopathic leeches in charge of managing the economy's resources?

Do you think the idiots and psychopaths that profited and advanced because of warped laws like that would allow anyone to change things until everyone was dead when it means they would have to admit they were inferior people, lose their ability to boss people better than them around, and lose their ability to make a living? Or would they keep fucking everything up until everyone was dead, always attributing the problems they created to something else?

And what would happen to the smart and ethical people in a civilization like that where people that would otherwise be incapable of surviving are promoted to positions of power and wealth? They'd die out because of the laws, wouldn't they.

You can make bad laws in a country to destroy the people that actually kept it going and completely obliterate both the civilization and the people so it can never recover and the mediocre people that were promoted won't see a problem with it while they terrorize people that say it's wrong and unsustainable.

The country could still function for a while by companies, run by psychopathic non-productive individuals, hire a handful of smart people: but the number of smart and ethical people would decrease by tens of millions a decade until there were none left because there are only about 10,000 positions in the entirety of the country that require a high intelligence and those highly intelligent people aren't going to leave smart kids to be used as slaves by a twisted civilization. So it would be completely over within 3 generations and those companies would absolutely have to recruit high IQ people from other countries that would just loot the tech and then go back home before the civilization collapse from more than brain drain, but brain extermination policies.

Who gets rich in the USA?

Who gets hired and who is excluded from key positions like those in government?

Don't you have to be smart and able to recognize patterns to enforce laws? So why does the USA have IQ caps on law enforcement?

Why is it that the USA's investments are all in things that don't produce anything like treasury bonds, rental schemes, and the trading card game of stocks in zombie companies that don't produce anything? Aren't the people that got rich from those things the very least capable of managing an economy?

Why is it that the USA's media celebrates mediocrity and rubs it in everyone's faces?

Aren't these things a clear sign that people within the USA are deliberately destroying it and it's population? And if they were doing that, such a systematic destruction of the human capital of the country, couldn't it only be for an enemy nation?

Hypothetically, how would the smart and ethical people of a country get out of a situation where there dumbest and most psychopathic people only were allowed to gain wealth and institutional power due to gatekeeping through changing the laws and hiring processes of a country?

Wouldn't the dumb and psychopathic people defend their claims that they earned their advancement to the death and terrorize the good people as they died from policies designed to destroy the population?

After transfering all the wealth to psychopathic non-productive people, would they ever allow you to ban the rackets, much less force them to return the wealth they didn't earn?

If you make a law saying you could hold people up on every road and demand a fee, and that created a 20 million strong population of racketeers claiming holding people up to demand a fee was a legitimate business, do you think they'd let you put an end to their "business" and take all their stolen wealth?

I want the owner and moderator of this site killed for obstructing Western communications

P16908
You're not white though so it's okay.